optimized by not creating a new array
looking at other submitted examples by the exercism community, there are other ways to go about this.
|1 year ago|
|README.md||1 year ago|
|accumulate.go||1 year ago|
|accumulate_test.go||1 year ago|
accumulate operation, which, given a collection and an
operation to perform on each element of the collection, returns a new
collection containing the result of applying that operation to each element of
the input collection.
Given the collection of numbers:
And the operation:
x => x * x)
Your code should be able to produce the collection of squares:
Check out the test suite to see the expected function signature.
Keep your hands off that collect/map/fmap/whatchamacallit functionality provided by your standard library! Solve this one yourself using other basic tools instead.
To run the tests run the command
go test from within the exercise directory.
If the test suite contains benchmarks, you can run these with the
go test -v --bench . --benchmem
Keep in mind that each reviewer will run benchmarks on a different machine, with different specs, so the results from these benchmark tests may vary.
For more detailed information about the Go track, including how to get help if you’re having trouble, please visit the exercism.io Go language page.
Conversation with James Edward Gray II https://twitter.com/jeg2
It’s possible to submit an incomplete solution so you can see how others have completed the exercise.